If you haven't familiarized yourself with the Jon Massey Case yet, click here.
As a summary of what has been presented in this blog so far, in addition to the article above, are the following factors:
As a summary of what has been presented in this blog so far, in addition to the article above, are the following factors:
- Ruby's story changed by a whole year and many events AFTER she had been interviewed for well over 30 hours that are documented.
- The county psychologist (PhD) testified under oath that he believed the original time frame was correct, and that if Ruby changed her story after he had confirmed the time frame and details with her, she would be unreliable.
- Ruby changed her story less than a week after the psychologist testified, and claimed that "nobody had ever asked her" about when the alleged abuse occurred and what happened.
- The county psychologist did NOT diagnose Ruby with sexual abuse, or PTSD (as would be expected) - only "adjustment disorder".
- The county psychologist was not allowed to testify at trial.
- A counselor (MSW) testified that Ruby's "delayed disclosure" and "acting out" behaviors are characteristic of Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAAS).
- CSAAS only is present when there has been a diagnosis of sexual abuse. See #4 above.
- The judge wrongfully invoked Rape Shield Law to prevent any testimony and witnesses regarding Ruby's relationship with a man that was the basis of her false allegations.
- The judge wrongfully invoked Rape Shield Law to prevent any testimony regarding Ruby's premeditation to remove Jon Massey from the house so she could continue the relationship.
- Ruby was unable to correctly provide physical description of Jon Massey - in fact she incorrectly described his physical characteristics.
- There were multiple violations that occurred from the judge and the district attorney, including wrongfully removing people from court, lying to the grand jury, and threatening defense witnesses.
These are just a quick summary of the "justice" that was meted out to Jon. If Jon was truly guilty, why were both the judge and the district attorney working so hard and violating so many rights to make sure they won the case?
Stand up for your rights, speak out against corruption!
No comments:
Post a Comment